Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • About Bonfire
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) boosted
Jon Snow
Jon Snow
@jonsnow@mastodon.online  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

Group Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAI

CEO Sam Altman happens to head a company that provides age verification services. Probably a coincidence.

https://gizmodo.com/group-pushing-age-verification-requirements-for-ai-turns-out-to-be-sneakily-backed-by-openai-2000741069

#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AgeVerification #IDVerification #privacy #surveillance #technology #enshittification #dystopia

Gizmodo

Group Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAI

It gave the leader of a nonprofit involved with it "a very grimy feeling."
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Jon Snow
Jon Snow
@jonsnow@mastodon.online  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

Group Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAI

CEO Sam Altman happens to head a company that provides age verification services. Probably a coincidence.

https://gizmodo.com/group-pushing-age-verification-requirements-for-ai-turns-out-to-be-sneakily-backed-by-openai-2000741069

#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AgeVerification #IDVerification #privacy #surveillance #technology #enshittification #dystopia

Gizmodo

Group Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAI

It gave the leader of a nonprofit involved with it "a very grimy feeling."
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) boosted
The New Oil
The New Oil
@thenewoil@mastodon.thenewoil.org  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

Inside the #Systemd #AgeVerification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism

https://itsfoss.com/dylan-taylor-systemd-controversy/

#privacy #FOSS #doxxing #IdentityVerification #Linux

It's FOSS

Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism

A single pull request turned a quiet open source contributor into the unlikely target of one of the Linux community's most heated controversies. We interacted with Dylan Taylor to hear his side of the story.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
@tokyo_0@mas.to  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

The useful idiot learned literally nothing.

https://itsfoss.com/dylan-taylor-systemd-controversy/

#dylanmtaylor #privacy #systemd

It's FOSS

Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism

A single pull request turned a quiet open source contributor into the unlikely target of one of the Linux community's most heated controversies. We interacted with Dylan Taylor to hear his side of the story.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
The New Oil
The New Oil
@thenewoil@mastodon.thenewoil.org  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

Inside the #Systemd #AgeVerification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism

https://itsfoss.com/dylan-taylor-systemd-controversy/

#privacy #FOSS #doxxing #IdentityVerification #Linux

It's FOSS

Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism

A single pull request turned a quiet open source contributor into the unlikely target of one of the Linux community's most heated controversies. We interacted with Dylan Taylor to hear his side of the story.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) boosted
Brian Greenberg :verified:
Brian Greenberg :verified:
@brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

I teach cybersecurity. And I genuinely don't know what to tell my students after this one. Federal reviewers spent years trying to get basic encryption documentation from Microsoft for its GCC High government cloud. They couldn't get it. One reviewer called the system a "pile of spaghetti pies," with data traveling from point A to point B the way you'd get from Chicago to New York: a bus to St. Louis, a ferry to Pittsburgh, and a flight to Newark. Each leg is a potential hijacking. They knew this. They said this out loud in writing. Then they approved it anyway in December 2024, because too many agencies were already using it. 🔐 That's not a security review. That's a hostage negotiation. Two things in this story should make every CISO and CIO uncomfortable:

🧩 Microsoft built its federal cloud on top of decades of legacy code that it apparently can't fully document itself
👮 "Digital escorts" often ex-military with minimal software engineering backgrounds are the firewall between Chinese engineers working on the system and classified U.S. networks 🤦🏻‍♂️

The scariest line in the whole ProPublica investigation isn't the "pile of shit" quote. It's this: FedRAMP determined that refusing authorization wasn't feasible because agencies were already using the product. Read that again. The security review process reached a conclusion based on sunk cost, not risk. Ex Post Facto Fallacy

If that logic holds, the compliance framework is just documentation theater. And right now, CISA is being hollowed out, so there are fewer people left to even run the theater.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/03/federal-cyber-experts-called-microsofts-cloud-a-pile-of-shit-approved-it-anyway/
#Cybersecurity #Microsoft #FedRAMP #Leadership #RiskManagement #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

Ars Technica

Federal cyber experts called Microsoft's cloud a "pile of shit," approved it anyway

One Microsoft product was approved despite years of concerns about its security.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Brian Greenberg :verified:
Brian Greenberg :verified:
@brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

I teach cybersecurity. And I genuinely don't know what to tell my students after this one. Federal reviewers spent years trying to get basic encryption documentation from Microsoft for its GCC High government cloud. They couldn't get it. One reviewer called the system a "pile of spaghetti pies," with data traveling from point A to point B the way you'd get from Chicago to New York: a bus to St. Louis, a ferry to Pittsburgh, and a flight to Newark. Each leg is a potential hijacking. They knew this. They said this out loud in writing. Then they approved it anyway in December 2024, because too many agencies were already using it. 🔐 That's not a security review. That's a hostage negotiation. Two things in this story should make every CISO and CIO uncomfortable:

🧩 Microsoft built its federal cloud on top of decades of legacy code that it apparently can't fully document itself
👮 "Digital escorts" often ex-military with minimal software engineering backgrounds are the firewall between Chinese engineers working on the system and classified U.S. networks 🤦🏻‍♂️

The scariest line in the whole ProPublica investigation isn't the "pile of shit" quote. It's this: FedRAMP determined that refusing authorization wasn't feasible because agencies were already using the product. Read that again. The security review process reached a conclusion based on sunk cost, not risk. Ex Post Facto Fallacy

If that logic holds, the compliance framework is just documentation theater. And right now, CISA is being hollowed out, so there are fewer people left to even run the theater.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/03/federal-cyber-experts-called-microsofts-cloud-a-pile-of-shit-approved-it-anyway/
#Cybersecurity #Microsoft #FedRAMP #Leadership #RiskManagement #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

Ars Technica

Federal cyber experts called Microsoft's cloud a "pile of shit," approved it anyway

One Microsoft product was approved despite years of concerns about its security.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Torsten :verified: :verified:
Torsten :verified: :verified:
@tor@norden.social  ·  activity timestamp 7 days ago

The discussion about age verification in systemd / Linux was locked. But the description of the merge request can be changed ...

The following part was removed: "helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation".

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/-/merge_requests/176
#ageVerification #systemd #Linux #FOSS #openness #transparency #freedom #Microsoft #privacy

Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd.
The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd. The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd. The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
@tokyo_0@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 6 days ago

@tor Never mind #Banksy, someone at Reuters should be doing a deep dive into #DylanMTaylor's bank accounts.

#ageVerification #privacy

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) boosted
Torsten :verified: :verified:
Torsten :verified: :verified:
@tor@norden.social  ·  activity timestamp 7 days ago

The discussion about age verification in systemd / Linux was locked. But the description of the merge request can be changed ...

The following part was removed: "helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation".

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/-/merge_requests/176
#ageVerification #systemd #Linux #FOSS #openness #transparency #freedom #Microsoft #privacy

Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd.
The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd. The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd. The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Torsten :verified: :verified:
Torsten :verified: :verified:
@tor@norden.social  ·  activity timestamp 7 days ago

The discussion about age verification in systemd / Linux was locked. But the description of the merge request can be changed ...

The following part was removed: "helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation".

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/-/merge_requests/176
#ageVerification #systemd #Linux #FOSS #openness #transparency #freedom #Microsoft #privacy

Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd.
The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd. The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
Screenshot of a merge request about adding a birth date field to systemd. The following part was removed from the description: "and helps support age verification requirements from recent legislation" .
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block

Hiti

हिति , in Nepāl Bhāṣā, is the word for a shared community water tap. Even in modern Newar cities, these ancient structures still pour out fresh mountain water piped through ancient underground filters and conduits. They are a place to wash, to talk, to drink, to meet the locals: a nourishing, refreshing social-ecological place.

Hiti: About · Code of conduct · Privacy ·
Bonfire social · 1.0.1 no JS en-GB
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Code of Conduct